Memorial Day -- some Indian scouts at Custer National Cemetery

"Rebel" -- the saga of Loreta Velazquez airing May 24 on your local Public Broadcasting Station

The signature image for "REBEL" is a composite of two portraits of
Loreta Velazquez passing as Lieutenant Harry T. Buford, soldier and spy
of the American Civil War, played by actress Romi Dias.
Photo by Gerard Gaskin, graphic work by Hayley Parker.

I’ll be tuning in Friday night for the airing of an intriguing PBS documentary, Rebel, about the life of Loreta Velazquez. A Cuban immigrant who came to New Orleans as a young girl, Velazquez reputedly disguised herself as a man, took the name Harry T. Buford, and saw action as a Confederate soldier in a number of campaigns. If her published reminisces are to be believed, she was also wounded on multiple occasions – once at Shiloh -- and served as a double-agent for both the Union and the Confederacy.

Her story – relayed in her 1876 memoir, The Woman in Battle, The Civil War Narrative of Loreta Velazquez, Cuban Woman and Confederate Soldier  – is so incredible, historians for the most part have dismissed it as fictionalized, or exaggerated. More recent scholarship on the participation of women in the Civil War, however, has corroborated parts of Velazquez’s account, and makes revisiting her narrative especially tantalizing. The book is partially previewed on Google books, and the University of Wisconsin Press released a paperback in 2003 that is still in print.

Most interesting to me are the other ways in which Velazquez was a “rebel” – her book was scandalous for the time, denounced by Jubal Early as pure fabrication. Her version of events failed to adhere to the “Moonlight and Magnolias” construction of Lost Cause apologists, who sought to disassociate slavery from secession and war. Worse, she called into question the gentility of Southern women and the heroism of the Southern soldier. The fact that Jubal Early later engaged in a letter writing campaign to discredit Velazquez’s account suggests to me that she was cutting close to the bone in a way that Reconstruction-era former Confederates could not tolerate.

Even if some of her story is made up, or cannot be confirmed, it’s a story worth telling. According to the filmmaker, Maria Agui Carter, Velazquez was one of only two Latina authors published in the United States in the 19^th century.  Said Carter in a blogged interview, “Her voice sounded so modern—here was a Victorian-era woman who made no apologies about breaking every gender, social, and ethnic boundary. There was something about her maverick nature and her constant reinvention that seemed quintessentially American to me."

Suffice it to say, if this program were airing on the History Channel, it would probably not bear watching. The dramatization alone would make it painful to behold. But PBS typically does a top notch job, and for this work Carter enlisted a host of venerable historians to weigh in -- people like Gary Gallagher at the University of Virginia, and DeAnne Blanton, the senior military archivist at the National Archives, as well numerous authorities on Latino Studies, Chicano Literature, and women in the war.

The Civil War Trust has a meaty sidebar on Valezquez here.  To watch a preview of Rebel, click here. 

150 years ago -- the May 22nd assaults at Vicksburg

Assault on the Great Redoubt
Ranger Will Wilson describes the Union position
at Battery de Golyer on the morning on May 22, 1863
More pictures here.

Andersonville National Historic Site

Bronze panel on the rear of the New York Monument.

I made my first visit to Andersonville National Historic Site a couple weeks ago, only 40 some years after my first attempt to read MacKinlay Kantor's Pulitzer Prize-winning novel. My wife and I were attending the 26^th annual meeting of the Association of Sultana Descendants and Friends. In all, 53 people attended the gathering, headquartered in Americus, Georgia. We spent one full day touring the prison site, the National Prisoner of War Museum, and the National Cemetery. 

Alan Huffman wrote an excellent
book chronicling, in part, the Civil
War saga of Anne's great grandfather.

Interpreting the site for us was historian Kevin Frye, who has devoted countless hours to helping people research the prisoners, and guards, assigned to Camp Sumter. A considerable number of passengers on the Sultana had been held at Andersonville. Anne's ancestor, who survived the disaster, was held at Cahaba prison in Alabama, though apparently some records do list him as spending time at Andersonville (we think erroneously). 

Like so many battlefields, the pastoral scene at Andersonville today, a rural expanse of green, with birds chirping in the pleasant spring weather, presents the visitor with little sense of the abject misery and horrors of the Civil War-era stockade.

One of Thomas O'Dea's drawings of the prison in 1864.
See a full set of his prison drawings here. 

Issuing rations, Andersonville Prison, Georgia, August 17, 1864.
Photo by A. J. Riddle (click to enlarge)

Below are a few images I took on April 27 (the anniversary of the Sultana explosion). To see a few dozen more photos, visit my Flickr set here. 

Kevin Frye telling the story of the prison 

Partial reconstruction of the stockade

The "Sinks" — downstream end of Stockade Branch

For reasons lost to history, the stone of Sgt. L. S. Tuttle
of Maine has a stone dove affixed to it, the only grave
in the National Cemetery with a special adornment. 

Dave the Slave, up close and personal

Back in November of 2009, I posted an interview with author Leonard Todd, discussing the subject of his book, Carolina Clay, the Life and Legend of Slave Potter Dave. The book is a fascinating account of Todd's discovery that one particularly skilled South Carolina potter was a slave owned by members of his family. He did not know that when he first read about an exhibition of Dave's work in a New York Times article in January of 2000. 

From the interview, which can be read here, Todd explained:

That moment of discovery was like finding a door flung wide to the past: Through it, I could glimpse a complex world of clay and kilns and pottery workers—that I had known nothing of. I was pleased to find that I was linked to Dave, one of the south's great artisans, yet dismayed that slavery was the mechanism that connected us. 

Flash forward to the year 2013. I had forgotten that certain examples of Dave's pottery were on display in select museums. At the time I read Todd's book, and interviewed him, I had no plans to travel to South Carolina, a state I had never visited until last month when the Civil War Forum held its 17th Battlefield Conference in Charleston. One of the stops on the first day of our gathering was a tour of the Civil War collection at the Charleston Museum, the oldest museum in America. 

It was tremendously exciting to turn a corner and see a display of local pottery, inscribed by the potters. I was hoping Dave's work would be featured, and sure enough, it was.  .  .  It's a great museum—set aside some time to visit, if you have the opportunity.

Charleston 2013 Reunion: Day Four

Fort Sumter, from Fort Moultrie

Some of the big guns at Fort Moultrie

Breech Inlet on Sullivan's Island, where the Hunley launched

Charleston 2013 Reunion: Day Three

Soldier graffiti, Secessionville Manor 

Pat Brennan leading the troops, Secessionville Manor

Pat Brennan, Battle of Secessionville

Pat Brennan, Rick Hatcher -- Charleston Battery,
discussing the ironclad assault on Fort Sumter. 

Charleston 2013 Reunion: Day Two

Seeing the Hunley at the Warren Lasch Conservation Center

Pat Brennan discussing his experience at the raising of the Hunley,
and prepping the crowd for tomorrow's Secessionville tour

Fort Sumter National Monument historian Rick Hatcher, spelling it all out.

Charleston 2013 Reunion: Day One

Major Steven Smith at the H.M.S. Seraph Memorial, Citadel Campus

Clay pot by "Dave the Slave," Charleston Museum. See this earlier blog post.

Grahame Long, Curator of History, at the oldest museum in the United States.

And so it begins -- The Civil War Forum in Charleston

Annual design, as always, by Stevan Meserve

[Captain Charles A. and Sergeant John M. Hawkins, Company E, "Tom Cobb Infantry," Thirty-eigth Regiment, Georgia Volunteer Infantry]

Opening today at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York City

Photography and the American Civil War

April 2–September 2, 2013

More than two hundred of the finest and most poignant photographs of the American Civil War have been brought together for this landmark exhibition. Through examples drawn from the Metropolitan's celebrated holdings of this material, complemented by important loans from public and private collections, the exhibition will examine the evolving role of the camera during the nation's bloodiest war. The "War between the States" was the great test of the young Republic's commitment to its founding precepts; it was also a watershed in photographic history. The camera recorded from beginning to end the heartbreaking narrative of the epic four-year war (1861–1865) in which 750,000 lives were lost. This traveling exhibition will explore, through photography, the full pathos of the brutal conflict that, after 150 years, still looms large in the American public's imagination.

Luray Caverns

Amazingly, the third-most visited cave in the United States, after Mammoth, and Carlsbad. An interesting Washington Post Magazine article can be read here.

7 Questions: Vicksburg Historian Terry Winschel

Terry Winschel, long-time historian at Vicksburg National Military Park, recently retired from the National Park Service. His illustrious career included serving as a Licensed Battlefield Guide at Gettysburg. He is the author of innumerable articles, and a long list of books on the Civil War, including The Civil War Diary of the Common Soldier, Triumph and Defeat: the Vicksburg Campaign (2 vols), and Vicksburg: Fall of the Confederate Gibraltar. His article, "Vicksburg Campaign: Unvexing the Father of Waters," can be read at The Civil War Trust website. 

DW: Congratulations on your retirement. How many years did you serve at Vicksburg National Military Park, and how many different roles did you have there?

TW: I began my association with the National Park Service in the summer of 1976 when I served as a Licensed Battlefield Guide at Gettysburg National Military Park. The following summer I landed a seasonal park ranger job at Gettysburg and have from that date been continuously employed by the NPS until my retirement in August 2012. From Gettysburg I went on to serve seasonal appointments at Vicksburg, Fredericksburg, and Valley Forge, after which I became a full-time employee of the NPS at Vicksburg and spent my entire permanent career in Mississippi.

Initially I served as an interpreter at Vicksburg manning the park's information desk and sales area, doing interpretive programs, and served as a member of the park's summer living history cannon crew. In 1988, however, the position of Historian was re-established and I was fortunate enough to be selected. It was the position in which I served for the duration of my career. 

The duties of that position were diverse and included managing the park's extensive archival, photographic, and map collections, the park library, and assisting researchers. They also entailed conducting Staff Rides for the military, tours of the campaign area for CWRTs, speaking at CWRTs and at academic symposia, helping to guide the park's interpretive operations, and drafting publications such as brochures and site bulletins.

In addition to the "official" duties and responsibilities I was allowed to take charge of the park's land acquisition program, serve as sexton of Vicksburg National Cemetery, was the park's public relations officer, and coordinator of the park's sales area. I also worked closely with the chief of maintenance on an array of projects from battlefield and monument restoration, to roads and bridges maintenance, to preservation of historic structures. Thus, as park historian, I wore many hats—as many as I wanted juggle.

DW: I have often thought about what it would be like to be so intimately connected to a battlefield, for such a long period of time. You've been eating, sleeping, and breathing Vicksburg for so long, is it even really possible to "retire"? 

TW: No it is not. Since my retirement I have been and will continue to conduct tours of Vicksburg and other battlefields across the nation, write a weekly column for the local newspaper on the Vicksburg campaign, and have a full writing plate for articles on the Vicksburg campaign for numerous periodicals. I also remain very active on the speaking circuit and this year will appear before a dozen CWRTs across the nation and speak at several academic seminars. I am also working with an array of partners at the federal, state, and local levels on battlefield preservation initiatives throughout the Vicksburg campaign area as well as at battlefields in a half-dozen other states. An exciting project that is currently underway is working with the Civil War Trust to develop a phone app on the Vicksburg campaign that will feature scores of "Virtual Signs," numerous videos, and animated maps of the campaign.

DW: What are some of the things you are most satisfied about accomplishing during your tenure at the Park? Were you able to increase the Park's holdings, influence the way the grounds were interpreted, restore historic areas?

TW: Among the accomplishments I'm proudest of are the permanent additions to the park. Over the years I drafted several pieces of legislation relative to Vicksburg that were passed by Congress authorizing boundary adjustments. As a result, the remaining vestige of Grant's Canal and Pemberton's Headquarters are now part of the park, and approximately 3,000 acres of land are preserved on sites associated with the Vicksburg campaign, but not under the jurisdiction of the NPS.

Seven new state monuments were added to the park during my tenure as historian—the process for which took years. In addition, many of the park's other state monuments were restored during those years, the combined costs of which was millions of dollars. I helped lay the ground work for the current battlefield restoration initiatives, assisted in the development of the park's current audio visual offerings, greatly expanded the park's archival, curatorial, and library holdings. In my final years with the agency, I worked diligently to preserve and enhance the hallowed grounds of Vicksburg National Cemetery. But my proudest accomplishment was keeping faith with the veterans themselves, the men who not only fought and died at Vicksburg, but those who labored to establish the park and make it an American shrine. And the greatest joy came from serving the visitors and making countless friends across the nation who share a similar passion for history.

General Grant stature, Grant's headquarters

DW: Is there an important story about Vicksburg that still needs to be told? 

TW: Yes, there is still so much that needs to be told. The story of Vicksburg's civilian population, both black and white, needs more light shined upon it, especially as it deals with Union occupation during the Civil War through Reconstruction. Confederate relief operations under Joseph E. Johnston and the efforts of the Trans-Mississippi Confederates to come to Vicksburg’s assistance is worthy of more than a chapter in most books on the campaign. Intelligence and counterintelligence operations during the campaign played more of a role than people know of and should be addressed by a worthy pen. The Battle of Milliken's Bend needs a full-length treatment, as too does the history of commemoration and the establishment of Vicksburg National Military Park. An atlas of day-to-day operations during the campaign is among the biggest voids in available literature on Vicksburg. And, of course, the naval story and its leading figures must be addressed more than in passing.

DW: Have you read the manuscript for Michael Ballard's forthcoming book, Grant at Vicksburg? And if so, what can we expect from one of the few Vicksburg sesquicentennial books on the docket?

TW: Yes. It is excellent! Not wishing to let the cat out of the bag, suffice it to say that readers will be well-pleased, especially those who think there is nothing new on Vicksburg about which to write. Mike has certainly established himself as Mississippi’s foremost authority on the Civil War in the West.

DW: Will you continue to research and write about Vicksburg? Anything in the works at present?

TW: Definitely. In addition to the app for the Civil War Trust, I am currently working on two magazine articles. As soon as the sesquicentennial observance is over here at Vicksburg and things slow down a little in terms of programs and tours, I plan to get back to work on the books I want to write. There are three in particular that I want to write and truly pray that I will complete them someday and leave them as part of the lasting legacy that honors those who wore the blue and gray. Researching and writing is a joy. . . .At present.

DW: What's in store for the sesquicentennial next summer? Should we all plan a visit? 

TW: The staff at Vicksburg NMP has put together a series of events which include:

• Heritage Show on April 5-7 that will feature musicians, dancers, and Civil War-era craft shows
• U.S. Postal Service release of Civil War commemorative Stamps on May 23
• "Shadows of the Past" candlelight tour of the park on May 23
• U.S. Navy Band concert on May 24
• Mississippi Symphony Orchestra performance on May 25
• Jackson Mass Community Choir on May 26
• Wreath Laying Ceremony in the national cemetery on May 27
• On July 4, there will be a grand illumination of the park at the different state monuments. For more information please call the park at 601-636-0583

Charleston in April: 2013 Civil War Forum Battlefield Conference

Painting of the H.L. Hunley by Conrad Wise Chapman, dated circa. 1863-64.

April 11-14: Civil War Charleston

The 17th annual CompuServe Civil War Forum Reunion is occurring in Charleston, SC this year. We have about 30 people signed up so far -- all are welcome, whether you participate in the Forum or not. We'll cut off registration at around 45 (one bus load).

$295 registration includes a seat on the bus, entrance fees to all locations (including museums and ferry ride to Fort Sumter), buffet dinner Friday and Saturday evenings, and box lunches for our Friday and Saturday outings [does not include lodging]. All monies over expenses to be donated to the Civil War Trust. 

See a tentative itinerary and registration information here. 
For more information, contact David Woodbury at civilwarforum[at]mac[dot]com.

3-D sonar provides new view of Civil War shipwreck

This 2012 high-resolution 3-D sonar image provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration shows the remains of the USS Hatteras, the only U.S. Navy ship sunk in combat in the Gulf of Mexico during the Civil War. The view is from the vessel’s port side, toward its stern. The long paddlewheel shaft, bent and angled, rests on the seabed with the fragmented remains of the port side paddlewheel on the right. (AP Photo/NOAA, Northwest Hydro Inc., James Glaeser) (Credit: AP)

Full story here. 

The Hunt for Abraham Lincoln’s Congressional Pay Records

Lincoln pay and mileage account for the First Session of the 30th Congress, National Archives

There's an utterly fascinating post, by David J Gerleman, at the National Archive Prologue blog on the search for Lincoln's Congressional pay records. I love Treasury Department treasure hunts.

Ironically, it was Lincoln’s great rival, Stephen A. Douglas, who helped set off an intense search for pay records of the 30th Congress. While hunting through an odd cache of files in the Auditors of the Treasury Records in pursuit of a Lincoln document involving “Coffee Mill Guns,” I stumbled across a handful of Douglas’s Senate pay vouchers from 1848. This small discovery reignited my hope that other Treasury records might yield up the elusive congressional pay files; thus began a test of archival digging that all dedicated historical researchers know well.

Read the whole post here.

Reprising a favorite blog post (from 2006)

Lately I have been mining the transcripts of various author Q and A sessions held in the Civil War Forum over the past ten years, featuring 40-some guests, as I collect the material together into some web-friendly format. Here are a few juicy tidbits I came across this weekend.

One thing that I asked of nearly everyone, often the first question, was whether there was anything in their studies that surprised them, or caused them to rethink their understanding of a person, a battle, or event. I love the idea of a scholar or researcher making discoveries, or experiencing revelations, or epiphanies. Here are a few examples of answers to that question by Jeffry Wert, William Marvel, Scott Harwig, and John Simon. And for the fun of it, I've tagged a couple more quotes onto the end, by Terry Winschel and Richard McMurry, just to tweak the sensibilities of those students hopelessly stuck in the Eastern Theater. 

Jeffry Wert, author, among other things, of books on Custer, and Longstreet, spoke with us on January 30. 1997.

Q. We'll start off with a question about Custer. Did you have any preconceived notions about George A. Custer that your research on the man caused you to rethink?


A. (Jeffry Wert): I probably had most of the preconceived ideas that most people had about Custer, and dealt with him in my first book, but now three things strike me—really changed with my research on Custer: 1) was his zest for life; 2) was the regard that his men held for him during the Civil War. I was surprised by the depth and the breath of it; and 3) was Little Big Horn, but that resulted from my lack of knowledge prior to it. My ideas on how it unfolded, and why he did certain things, changed considerably. We don't know all the answers, but his actions make sense -- not all of them, but numbers of them do. 

Q. I would like to ask a similar question about James Longstreet, Lee's "Old Warhorse." How did your understanding of the man evolve during the course of your research? 


A. (Jeffry Wert): I wish there had been more personal material, first of all, but they seem to have been destroyed in the fire that consumed his house after the war. But with that said, I found him to be a better general than I thought he would be. I think he was very much of a realist about war, far more than other Southern generals. Despite his post-war politics, most of the men who served under him never lost their respect or admiration for the man. And, finally, I was surprised at the dissension among the Army of Northern Virginia officer ranks, particularly among 1st Corps officers, in their perception of alleged favoritism towards Virginians.

William Marvel, author of Andersonville, The Last Depot, and many other titles. 

Q. During the course of your research on Andersonville, were there any discoveries or realizations that substantially changed your understanding of Civil War-era prisons, and prisoners? 


A. (William Marvel): Yes. Specifically, the degree to which the suffering on the Southern side was much less as a result of deliberate maltreatment than was originally thought. And also how much worse the treatment of Confederate prisoners by Union soldiers was, than was originally believed—not that the Union guards were particularly malicious, but they were much more stern and tended to shoot much more frequently for minor infractions than I was led to believe by the rather cursory secondary works on the subject. 

And at Andersonville in particular I was impressed by the efforts that were made to meet the needs of the prisoners. It was generally believed that the Confederates tended to force the Union prisoners into such actions as crossing the dead line so they could be shot—for sport, virtually—and that the prisoners were starved deliberately. In fact, only on a few occasions was food deliberately withheld from them, and most of their suffering resulted from the general poverty of the Confederate government. The only administration policy to withhold food from prisoners was actually exercised by Union prison authorities, in retaliation for the perceived deliberate starvation of their own prisoners in Confederate hands. 

D. Scott Hartwig, then chief historian at Gettysburg National Military Park, joined us on Thursday, July 18, 1996: 

Q. In your capacity as historian at the Gettysburg battlefield, I imagine you've had the opportunity to tramp all over that hallowed ground. Can you think of any discoveries you've made, or revelations you've had, which resulted from a more intimate knowledge of the topography of the battlefield?

A. (Scott Hartwig): Sure, lots of them—this would be the case with any battlefield that you're able to spend a lot of time on. When you can walk a field from many different angles and approaches, you learn the subtleties of the ground. When you start to understand those, the battle begins to become understandable, and you can fill in details that the soldiers who were there may not have mentioned. Last year I did a program on the attack of Laws' brigade on Little Round Top, and the Confederates all mentioned that Union sharpshooters were posted behind a stone wall, near the Slyder Farm, and I couldn't find the stone wall. There wasn't one, and I looked and looked and looked, and I kept walking down the line where the wall would have been, and there it was. I found the remnants of it. So there was confirmation, to me, that there had been a wall there, and that the wall had been removed after the war—for unknown reasons. That's just one example. 

John Y. Simon, speaking on September 29, 2000, is the editor of the The Papers of U.S. Grant. 

Q. Dr. Simon, welcome. You've been editing "The Papers" since 1962. Are you getting tired of Grant yet, or still finding new information, or new sides to the man? 

A. (John Simon) I've never thought that I understood the man fully, and for that reason I've never become tired of him. People don't ask you questions like that about your wife, and I've been married to her for a long time. Grant's a very real person, and one with many dimensions to him. There's still more to learn and I'm eager to do it. We're into the presidential years now, but I'm still fascinated by the Civil War period. And there are documents that we haven't found yet, but those that are coming to light, almost daily, cast new perspectives on Grant. 

Q. What do you think, based on your readings of his correspondence, may be the biggest misconceptions about Grant? Was there anything that you were surprised to learn, or which slowly changed your perception of him? 

A. (John Simon) Well I've been increasingly impressed by what a good writer he is. He has the capacity to express what he's thinking in the clearest possible form. He's a maker of memorable phrases. One of our interesting discoveries many years ago was when he wrote the famous line about fighting it out on this line if it takes all summer, he originally wrote, "If it takes me all summer." Then he went back and crossed out the word "me." He's conscious of just who's doing that fighting, and knows that that word "me" is inappropriate. Normally, the words just flow out as they did in the celebrated letter that he wrote at Appomattox, but when necessary he revised what he was writing.

Bonus Stonewall had nothing on Grant question: 

Terry Winschel, chief historian at Vicksburg National Military Park, joined us on December 5, 1996. 

Q. How do you think Grant's movements from the time that he crossed the Mississippi till he invested Vicksburg compare with Stonewall Jackson's Valley campaign?

A. (Terry Winschel): Grant's movements after he crossed the Mississippi River were bold, decisive, and kept his opponent unbalanced, and in that regard compare quite favorable with Stonewall Jackson's movements in the Valley. They demonstrate that Grant was master of the situation, and was a bold and aggressive officer. In a 17-day period, Grant's army would push deep into Mississippi, encounter and defeat Confederate forces in five engagements, and drive Pemberton's army back into the city's fortifications.It is a brilliant campaign that is studied by professional soldiers to this date, and Grant's campaign for Vicksburg is highlighted in the chapter on offensive operations in the army's current field manual FM100-5. 

Bonus Gettysburg is fascinating-but-irrelevant question: 

Richard McMurry, author of Two Great Rebel Armies: An Essay in Confederate Military History, speaking with us on Thursday, August 1, 1996 

Q. Thank you for being with us tonight. In your book Two Great Rebel Armies, and elsewhere, you have made the point—convincingly, I think—that the war was won and lost in the West. I wonder if you would start us off this evening with a summary of that argument, for the benefit of any Virginia-centric members who may be in attendance. 


A. (Richard McMurry): I think the best way to answer that is just to ask people to look at a map, and to ask where the armies were in 1861, 1862 1863, 1864, 1865. If you do that you will see that the armies that started out in 1861 in Missouri and Kentucky were in Tennessee, Mississippi in 1862 and 1863. They were in Georgia in 1864. They were in the Carolinas in 1865. And where were the armies that started out in Virginia in 1861? Or to put it another way, the Federal armies captured, if memory serves me correctly, 9 of the 11 Confederate state capitals. The western armies captured 8 of them, including Columbia, South Carolina and Raleigh, North Carolina, which means that at the end of the war, the western Union armies were about 160 to 170 miles from Richmond. What it amounts to is that Western battles and campaigns produced results. Eastern battles and campaigns produced stalemates. And I would just summarize it all by saying that no battle fought east of the Appalachian Mountains had any military impact on the outcome of the war.

Civil War Christmas gifts

General Sherman to President Lincoln
(Telegram offering Savannah, Georgia as a Christmas present)
—transcription of above—

December 22, 1864 Dec 25— Dec. 25, 1864.

Savannah Ga Dec 22. 1864 
Via Ft. Monroe Va Dec 25. 

I beg to present you as a Christmas gift the City of Savannah with 150 heavy guns & plenty of ammunition & also about 25.000 bales of cotton. 

W. T. Sherman 
Major Genl

Charity Snider's mole skin

Letter from Charity Snider, with accompanying mole skin, from her Civil War Widow's Pension Application File. Discoloration on the paper is from the mole skin. (WC843258, Record Group 15), National Archives.

In order to receive a pension, Civil War widows had to prove that they had actually been married to a soldier. Marriage records were far less consistent in the past than they are today, which explains why Charity Snider ended up sending the pressed skin of a dead mole to the federal government. Read the full Slate article here. 

The President is taller than General Grant, and still growing. . .

This just in. . . the General Grant tree in Sequoia National Park, once considered the 2^nd largest tree in the world (after the nearby General Sherman tree), has been relegated to the 3^rd spot on the list. A still-growing youngster -- the 3,240-year-old giant sequoia known as The President – has moved up to the number 2 slot.

I wrote about the General Grant, General Sherman, and Lincoln tree back in June of 2006. You can read that here.  A fine article from Yahoo News on the ascendancy of The President can be read here.

Carto-geeks are cool

Looking at the Battle of Gettysburg
Through Robert E. Lee's Eyes

by Tony Horwitz

Smithsonian Ingenuity Award Winner, Anne Kelly Knowles

"A red dot denotes General Lee’s vantage point from the top of the Lutheran Seminary. His field of vision shows as clear ground, with blind spots shaded in deep indigo. Knowles has even factored in the extra inches of sightline afforded by Lee’s boots. “We can’t account for the haze and smoke of battle in GIS, though in theory you could with gaming software,” she says."